1.
In your own words and using referenced quotes describe the
difference between ‘business unit level’ strategy and ‘corporate level’
strategy?
Business
Unit Level Strategy:
The way
business seeks to compete successfully in the market is called business unit
level strategy. It is the decision a company takes on its way to maintain,
create and use its competitive advantage. A strategic business unit is a
semi-autonomous unit for an organization. This unit is responsible for its own
price setting, budgeting and new product decision. The corporate headquarter
consider Strategic Business Unit as an internal profit Center.
Bases of Competition
Price
Differentiation
Hybrid
Focus
|
Achieving Competitive Advantage
Sustainability
Hypercompetition
Collaboration
Game
Theory
|
|
SBU
Strategies
|
||
Detailed Choices
Directions
Methods
|
Figure:
Business Level Strategies
Corporate level strategy:
Corporate level
strategy is all strategic decision that affects the firm as a whole. It is
concerned with overall purpose and scope of an organization. Adding value to
its business unit is the main objective of corporate level strategy. The
Corporate level strategies affect the matters such as deciding the size and composition
of business portfolio of the overall firm.
Differences between Business Unit Level Strategy and Corporate
Level Strategy:
Both
business unit level strategy and corporate level strategy are important to a
firm. They should be employed efficiently and effectively by any firm. However,
they need to be used differently. A business level strategies needs to be used
to solve specific problems whereas corporate level strategy needs to be used
when the matter is about broader issues.
Further,
business level strategy can be changed regularly depending upon the time and
changes in the markets. While corporate strategies on the other hand should not
be changed frequently as they deal with long term planning.
Business
level strategies are very much focused, however corporate strategy always deal
with broad issue.
The issue
of corporate strategy is very much complex and have higher impact on the firm as
compared to business level strategy.
Corporate
level strategy requires more resources as well as consideration.
Source: http://www.robabdul.com/the-virgin-group-case-study.asp
The Virgin group is one
of the one of the UK’s largest private company. According to 1996 survey, 96%
of UK consumers were aware of the brand Virgin.
Virgin
has been described as a “keiretsu” organization. Further, the Virgin Group had
controlled by Mr. Richard Branson. His approach to management style was one
that decentralized decision making and responsibility of the own development. Branson
ruled by delegating power to managers, however when it came to marketing and
promotion, he would take more involved role.
The
name Virgin was chosen so that the brand can be remained virgin in every
business it enters. Virgin’s expansion into new markets had been through a
series of joint venture whereby Virgin provided the brand name and the partner
provided the majority capital. It is involved in mobile telephony, travel,
financial services, leisure, music, holidays and health and wellness. It partners
with others and transfers and combines skills, knowledge and operational
expertise from a wide range of industries. Also, Virgin Group Company is able
to run their business by their self. Further the company actively helps each
other to solve problems.
Virgin
is involved in not only commercial activities but it is involved in finding
solutions to world major issues or problem. With the help of Virgin Unite, a nonprofit
foundation, it is organizing campaign like health, economic empowerment,
conservation and climate change.
By
observing the ownership, the corporate structure and the management style of
Virgin Group, we can say that Virgin is following the Synergy manager corporate
parenting style. The synergy manager is a corporate parenting style looking to
enhance value across business units by managing synergies across business
units. We can easily say that Virgin is following synergy manager corporate
parenting style because of the following reasons:
Resources and activities are
shared:
Virgin
group use common distribution system across its business. It uses the same from
brand name for each of its products and services. In many of the countries its
offices are shared by its smaller business units depending upon the
geographical diversity.
Skills are transferable:
Virgin
Group also actively transfers their skills to the required industry. For
example Virgin Music can transfer its skill to Virgin Cinema and vice-versa to
improve its technology. Further, Virgin Group has its own value adding capabilities
by which one business unit help each other in sharing technologies, skills and
knowledge. The accumulated knowledge and skills learned in one business is
utilized in another business unit in the Virgin Group. This has helped Virgin
Group to increase its performance. In addition, marketing and R&D are the
expertise skills which are used by Virgin Group to improve the performance of
the newly launched products.
Source: http://earthandindustry.com/2010/04/7-international-companies-with-a-strong-green-gene/virgin-group-green-business/
Source: http://www.cascadiaprospectus.org/2010/11/bransons_virgin_group_step_int.php
Source: http://centreforaviation.com/analysis/industry-watchers-are-now-focused-on-the-fate-of-virgin-atlantic-46229
Source: http://www.justwirelesscoupons.com/category/wireless-coupons/virgin-mobile-promo-code/
Source: http://blogs.ubc.ca/cindywenyicui/2010/11/15/an-entrepreneurial-company-virgin/
Source: http://www.businessinsider.com/richard-branson-fails-virgin-companies-that-went-bust-2012-4?op=1
- Johnson, Whittington and Scholes (2011) Exploring Strategy, 9th Edition, Pearson Education, Chapter 1
- Johnson, Whittington and Scholes (2011) Exploring Strategy, 9th Edition, Pearson Education, Chapter 7
- De Wit, B and Meyer, R (editors) (2010). 4th Edition Strategy: Process, Content, Context, Thomson International Business Press: London. Chapter 6
- The Economist, ‘Cross his heart’, 5 October (2002)
- ‘Virgin on the ridiculous’, 29 May (2003)
- P. McCosker, ‘Stretching the brand: a review of the Virgin Group’, European Case Clearing House, 2000.
- Strategic Direction, ‘Virgin Flies High with Brand Extensions’, vol. 18, no. 10, (October 2002).
- R. Hawkins, ‘Executive of Virgin Group outlines corporate strategy’ Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News, July 29 (2001a).
- R. Hawkins, ‘Branson in new dash for cash’, Sunday Business, 29 July (2001b)
- C. Vignali, ‘Virgin Cola’, British Food Journal, vol. 103, no. 2 (2001), pp. 131–139.
- M. Wells, ‘Red Baron’, Forbes Magazine, vol. 166, no. 1, 7 March (2000).
No comments:
Post a Comment